This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: std::pow implementation
- From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
- To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
- Cc: Theodore Papadopoulo <Theodore dot Papadopoulo at sophia dot inria dot fr>, Martin Reinecke <martin at MPA-Garching dot MPG dot DE>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 10:39:17 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: std::pow implementation
- References: <200308041351.h74DpZIw005089@mururoa.inria.fr><email@example.com>
Hey guys, maybe we can rename this thread to "The Zen of Optimizing C++ - What
is the sound of one compiler inlining?" or something, rather than "std::pow
implementation", since it stopped being about std::pow maybe 90 messages
> Theodore Papadopoulo <Theodore.Papadopoulo@sophia.inria.fr> writes:
> | > I'll send in a moment a text I intended to send some time ago.
> | I'll read it.
> | Note that my point was not to discuss how inline should be honoured.
> | I gave just many contradicting facts:
> and I appreciate them.