This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: std::pow implementation
- From: dewar at gnat dot com (Robert Dewar)
- To: dewar at gnat dot com, gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
- Cc: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com, aoliva at redhat dot com,coyote at coyotegulch dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, kgardas at objectsecurity dot com,rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:05:33 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: std::pow implementation
> | In fact, the liberal use of inline tends to *prevent* premature optimization
>
> That might be true for Ada, I'm doubteful it translates to C++ word-for-word.
I really don't see a difference, other than that Ada programmers have been
used to using inline liberally for twenty years :-)