This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: std::pow implementation


Richard Guenther <rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes:

| > | Now cut away all the redundant labels and other cruft, and you end up
| > | with:
| >
| > In short, you have demonstrated that if "inline" is given its obvious
| > meaning, the compiler can do a better job.  That is what I claimed in
| > the first place.
| 
| Note that Steven checked with -O3, so wether inline is specified here or
| not should be meaningless(?).

I'm not sure that should be meaningless.  At -O3, GCC does not inline
imaginable functions.

-- Gaby


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]