Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues)

[Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>]

On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 12:02:28AM +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Op ma 28-07-2003, om 22:40 schreef Zdenek Dvorak:
> > What would be the purpose of making the changes in my private tree?  I think
> > it is better to expose my work to other people as well.
> 
> This is true of course; you're not going to get the required testing
> unless development is done in public.  But in fact, with the current
> number of branches, you're not going to get the testing if you work on
> the rtl-opt branch.
> 
> Just look at the gcc-testresults archive: No more than 4 test results
> this month, all of them from phil's autocrasher, ie. one target.

. o O ( I don't recall telling it to test rtl-opt... )

*looks at gcc-testresults*

Oh.  I should find a different tag name.  That's the 3.3 branch, configured
with rtl and rtlflag added to --enable-checking.


-- 
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace.  We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms.  Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.            - Samuel Adams