This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Please review the patch for PR10060 (compile-time-hog, ice-on-valid-code, memory-hog)

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 07:20:43 -0400
Subject: Re: Please review the patch for PR10060 (compile-time-hog, ice-on-valid-code, memory-hog)

On Friday, Jul 25, 2003, at 07:07 US/Eastern, Steven Bosscher wrote:

Hi,

Could a reviewer have a look at Andrew Pinski's patch
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-07/msg01310.html) for bug 10060
(http://gcc.gnu.org/PR10060) and approve it or say what's wrong with
it?  If the patch is correct, I hope we can still kill this bug before
3.3.1 goes out.

This bug is really bad, you can see from the keywords it has in
Bugzilla: compile-time-hog, ice-on-valid-code, memory-hog.  It is a
shame that a patch like this should stay unreviewed for two weeks.


The patch only fixes the ice-on-valid-code though.
The compile-time-hog is two different places one in the front-end
logged as PR 10717, the other one is regclass which is not files yet.


Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

References:
- Please review the patch for PR10060 (compile-time-hog,ice-on-valid-code, memory-hog)
  - From: Steven Bosscher

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]