This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [C++] NEW_EXPR and PR c++/11406

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 21 Jul 2003 16:11:05 -0700
Subject: Re: [C++] NEW_EXPR and PR c++/11406
References: <m3k7abtslz.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net><1058828209.19997.38.camel@doubledemon.codesourcery.com> <m33cgztrlh.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>

> | That second parameter should really be a TYPE -- not a declarator
> | thingy.  If you are interested in fixing that, you want to move the bits
> | out of build_new that handle the TREE_LIST case and move them into the
> | parser.
> 
> It seems the long-term winning plan is to fix the logic of building
> new-expression and not hack cp/error.c to accept the TREE_LIST in
> new-expression.  Is that correct? 

Yes.

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com

References:
- [C++] NEW_EXPR and PR c++/11406
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: [C++] NEW_EXPR and PR c++/11406
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]