This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: prolog vs prologue

From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
To: Ben Elliston <bje at wasabisystems dot com>
Cc: Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot com>,Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 14:39:15 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: prolog vs prologue
References: <Pine.BSF.4.44.0307150914350.4610-100000@dair.pair.com><87wuej9wj8.fsf@sashimi.wasabisystems.com> <20030716110346.A25968@synopsys.com><873ch6ru7h.fsf@sashimi.wasabisystems.com>

On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, Ben Elliston wrote:
>> Sigh.  I thought that we were discussing fixing the manual, not
>> renaming options.
> It's kind of important that they're both fixed ;-)

As there seems to be agreement, would you mind adding this to the table
in codingconventions.html?  (Trivially pre-approved.)

Thanks,
Gerald

References:
- Re: prolog vs prologue
  - From: Hans-Peter Nilsson
- Re: prolog vs prologue
  - From: Ben Elliston
- Re: prolog vs prologue
  - From: Joe Buck
- Re: prolog vs prologue
  - From: Ben Elliston

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]