This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining g95
- From: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>
- To: Ben Elliston <bje at wasabisystems dot com>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 14:55:59 +0200
- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining g95
- Organization: Moene Computational Physics, Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
- References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Ben Elliston wrote:
Paul Brook <email@example.com> writes:
We thing we're now ready for inclusion. Nothing special needs to be
done: just drop in the g95 and libgfor directories, and a small
patch to teach toplevel configure about libgfor.
libgfor seems like an award name -- it's not clear what "for" stands
for. [:-)] Is it the G95 runtime? If so, how about libg95?
Indeeed - an award-winning name :-) - What we try to achieve is to
loosen the strings between the GNU Fortran 95 project and the Fortran 95
standard. In about a year there will be a new standard (informally
known as Fortran 2000); obviously we want to expand the compiler (and
run time library to embrace that standard. It won't be helpful to be
bound to the `g95' name, then ...
Toon Moene - mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org - phoneto: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html
GNU Fortran 95: http://gcc-g95.sourceforge.net/ (under construction)