This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3 uClinux toolchain 20030712 snapshot
- From: Bernardo Innocenti <bernie at codewiz dot org>
- To: Dan Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>
- Cc: uClinux development list <uclinux-dev at uclinux dot org>,GCC Mailing List <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>,CrossGCC Mailing List <crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com>,Peter Barada <pbarada at mail dot wm dot sps dot mot dot com>
- Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 22:09:35 +0200
- Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3 uClinux toolchain 20030712 snapshot
- Organization: Develer S.r.l.
- References: <email@example.com> <3F11A3EA.firstname.lastname@example.org>
On Sunday 13 July 2003 20:24, Dan Kegel wrote:
> That's an awesome little script. I'll link to that page from the next
> release of http://www.kegel.com/crosstool/
The official uClinux toolchain (which is still using 2.95.3) is here:
My site is just a placeholder for the new toolchain until all
major bugs get squashed.
> > A good third party review all over my GCC patch collage would also be
> > greatly appreciated.
> I have the same problem -- I'm collecting up the little patches I need
> to build, and as time goes on, the collection gets a little scary.
Yeah, expecially when most patches are on top of each other and you
need to fix a bug in the patch being applied first ;-)
> In order to make future reviews easier, I'm prefixing each patch
> with links to the appropriate Bugzilla entries and/or mailing list
> archive pages and/or description of the bug it's meant to fix.
Yes, but I need to add some more information describing the patches
in the headers. I've not written the bigger patches myself. I've
just imported them from other places.
> I see you're doing the same thing on most of your patches,
> but I don't see any links to Bugzilla entries. You might consider
> adding them to the prologues of your patches.
Most of these are uClinux-specific problems I've found and fixed myself.
They are not in GCC's bugzilla.
// Bernardo Innocenti - Develer S.r.l., R&D dept.
Please don't send Word attachments - http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html