This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Bug middle-end/10060] ICE (stack overflow) on huge file (300klines) due to recursive behaviour of copy_rtx_if_shared, in emit_rtl.c
- From: Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>
- To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Bugzilla Masters <bugzilla-masters at dberlin dot org>
- Date: 11 Jul 2003 11:12:10 +0200
- Subject: Re: [Bug middle-end/10060] ICE (stack overflow) on huge file (300klines) due to recursive behaviour of copy_rtx_if_shared, in emit_rtl.c
- References: <20030313122600.10060.andreas@florath.net> <20030711022710.28220.qmail@sources.redhat.com> <94B4F452-B364-11D7-81C8-000A95A34564@dberlin.org>
Op vr 11-07-2003, om 07:57 schreef Daniel Berlin:
> Maybe we want a "memory-hog" keyword for test cases that take up >xM (x
> is debatable) on the current HEAD?
> And a "time-hog" keyword for test cases that take up some absurd amount
> of compile time (compared to a previous version or not, debatable)
> That way, we can tell where the good cases to profile gcc time and
> memory usage against are, without having to remember what bug numbers
> the cases were attached to?
>
> This would also help when people test patches supposed to fix some time
> or memory issue, to see if it helps on other large cases.
I like the idea.
Gr.
Steven