This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer

From: Peter Barada <pbarada at mail dot wm dot sps dot mot dot com>
To: wilson at tuliptree dot org
Cc: Peter dot Barada at motorola dot com, bernie at develer dot com, hp at bitrange dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Peter dot Barada at motorola dot com
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 16:34:54 -0400
Subject: Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer
References: <Pine.BSF.4.44.0307080400550.22413-100000@dair.pair.com><200307090947.20714.bernie@develer.com> <200307091516.h69FGdu14252@hyper.wm.sps.mot.com> <1057782012.1020.33.camel@leaf.tuliptree.org>

>See for instance the pushsi pattern in i386.md, and the
>general_no_elim_operand predicate that it uses.

Do I only have to care about the pushsi patterns, or do I have to
worry about all of the patterns that use '<' as a constraint (found 27
times in m68k.md)?  Also can I use general_no_elim_operand verbatim?

-- 
Peter Barada                             Peter.Barada@motorola.com
Wizard                                   781-852-2768 (direct)
WaveMark Solutions(A Motorola Company)   781-270-0193 (fax)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer
  - From: Jim Wilson

References:
- Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer
  - From: Hans-Peter Nilsson
- Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer
  - From: Bernardo Innocenti
- Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer
  - From: Peter Barada
- Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer
  - From: Jim Wilson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]