This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure

From: "Zack Weinberg" <zack at codesourcery dot com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>, Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 15:03:27 -0700
Subject: Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
References: <je4r1xuq2i.fsf@sykes.suse.de><200307081526.26404.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr><jeel11t8h2.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <20030708143705.GA13718@lucon.org><20030708211142.GA19746@lucon.org> <877k6s65wv.fsf@codesourcery.com><20030708220052.GZ20507@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>

Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes:

> On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 02:54:24PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
>> You are looking in the wrong place.  The observed difference is a
>> register allocation choice; why aren't you looking at the register
>> allocator?
>
> It actually looks like scheduler to me. The 2 insns are simply swapped.

My bad, I misread the assembly dump.  Agree it's probably something
with the scheduler.

zw

References:
- [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]