This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
"H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> writes:
|> On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 04:10:33PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
|> > Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> writes:
|> >
|> > |> > @@ -2054,10 +2054,10 @@
|> > |> > 2a50: 0b 70 00 1e 18 10 [MMI] ld8 r14=[r15];;
|> > |> > 2a56: 70 00 38 0c 72 00 cmp.eq p7,p6=0,r14
|> > |> > 2a5c: 00 00 04 00 nop.i 0x0;;
|> > |> > - 2a60: dc 00 20 40 98 11 [MFB] (p06) st8 [r32]=r8
|> > |> > + 2a60: fc 00 20 1e 98 11 [MFB] (p07) st8 [r15]=r8
|> > |> > 2a66: 00 00 00 02 00 00 nop.f 0x0
|> > |> > 2a6c: 00 00 00 20 nop.b 0x0
|> > |> > - 2a70: e0 00 20 1e 98 11 [MII] (p07) st8 [r15]=r8
|> > |> > + 2a70: c0 00 20 40 98 11 [MII] (p06) st8 [r32]=r8
|> > |> > 2a76: f0 c0 22 00 42 00 adds r15=88,r8
|> > |> > 2a7c: 04 40 00 84 mov r32=r8
|> > |> > 2a80: 0a 70 00 46 18 10 [MMI] ld8 r14=[r35];;
|> > |>
|> > |> It bears some ressemblance with PR optimization/11320, where the machine
|> > |> dependent reorg pass also swaps two insns.
|> >
|> > Could be, but then I would have expected that the stage1 compiler
|> > generates the same code. I'd rather think this is similar to the problem
|> > that lead to the replacement of PWD with PWD_COMMAND.
|> >
|>
|> Yes, it is true. Can you duplicate the result on the command line?
Running the same (stage2) compiler command on the command line produces
output that is the same as the output from the stage1 compiler. So it
indeed looks like it's dependent on the environment size.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."