This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: What happened to libfeutil?
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
- To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, mark at codesourcery dot com, zack at codesourcery dot com
- Date: 08 Jul 2003 10:14:49 +0200
- Subject: Re: What happened to libfeutil?
- Organization: Integrable Solutions
- References: <20030707183120.67ab7b25.bkoz@redhat.com>
Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> writes:
| > I like libcpp better -- after all /lib/cpp is the historical program
| > which is being replaced.
|
| I'm not really dead-set on libpp.
If the "fe" in libfeutil stands for "Front End", then that really is a
terrible name :-(
| I'd just thrown this suggestion into the void because I think libcpp is
| going to wind up being pretty confusing to people who aren't gcc
| developers. Ie: libcpp vs libstdc++ which one is the c++ library? I
I don't think we can do anythinig against that confusion, except
education.
| believe in some environments the C++ Standard Library is called libcpp.
not mentioning that we accept .cpp as extension of files containing
C++ programs :-/
-- Gaby