This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos


"Zack Weinberg" <zack@codesourcery.com> writes:
> >>> Sorry, I probably meant "yes", as in one of these two is a suitable
> >>> definition of uintptr_t on all GCC targets AFAIK:
> >>>
> >>> 	typedef unsigned long uintptr_t;
> >>> 	typedef unsigned long long uintptr_t;
> >>
> >> If the first one isn't a suitable definition of uintptr_t for some
> >> target, the ABI is broken.  (I know C99 allows
> >> sizeof(long) < sizeof(void *). C99 is wrong.)
> >
> > 64-bit MS Windows uses AFAIK a P64 model where the long is 32-bit and
> > pointers are 64-bit - I agree the ABI is broken indeed,
> 
> That does unfortunately mean we'll have to care eventually, but I vote
> for not caring until someone does a 64-bit Windows port.

The mips port supports a form of EABI with 64-bit pointers but
32-bit longs.

Richard


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]