This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Loop optimizer issues
- From: Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>
- To: Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>
- Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>, pop at gauvain dot u-strasbg dot fr, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 02 Jul 2003 12:10:02 -0700
- Subject: Re: Loop optimizer issues
- References: <20030530183552.GA27110@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz><1054585449.9789.146.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com><20030603075956.GB11555@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz><20030603083835.GB23604@gauvain.u-strasbg.fr><20030603084726.GA17851@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz><20030603161718.GA9794@gauvain.u-strasbg.fr><20030702183325.GA10865@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> writes:
> Hello,
>
> just for sure -- nobody will protest if I drop handling of libcalls
> in new loop optimizer? This definitely should not be neccesary to handle
> on rtl level.
How do you plan to handle ports where multiplication or addition
requires a libcall?
--
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>