This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Removing -fssa
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- To: law at redhat dot com
- Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, law at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 01 Jul 2003 20:43:46 -0700
- Subject: Re: Removing -fssa
- References: <200307020335.h623ZSq4003844@speedy.slc.redhat.com>
On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 20:35, law@redhat.com wrote:
> In message <1057112372.24216.179.camel@doubledemon.codesourcery.com>, Mark Mitc
> hell writes:
> >On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 19:10, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, Jul 1, 2003, at 22:03 US/Eastern, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> >> > I'd like to remove -fssa from the mainline and disable it on the
> >> > branch.
> >> >
> >> > The manual already documents this switch as not ready for production
> >> > use, and the tree-ssa branch is what we really want for this
> >> > functionality. Having it on the mainline and branch is just creating
> >> > confusion for users, and bogus PRs in the database.
> >> >
> >> > Any objections?
> >>
> >> There was some objections when I proposed in May
> >> <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-05/msg02015.html>.
> >
> >I've copied Jeff since he was the objector.
> >
> >Jeff, my feeling is that putting the code out there for users to shoot
> >themselves in the foot with is a mistake. If there's going to be a
> >mid-level RTL branch, great -- this stuff can get moved there at some
> >point. But, for now, it should just go away.
> >
> >Do you still think we should hold on to this code?
> I think we should hold onto it -- in the form of files in the Attic :-)
Cool -- that's what I had in mind. Ain't revision control a great
invention?
> Go ahead and kill it.
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com