This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
Cc: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>, zack at codesourcery dot com, dj at redhat dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 27 Jun 2003 22:01:44 +0200
Subject: Re: RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch
Organization: Integrable Solutions
References: <20030624234835.GA4852@lucon.org><200306250114.h5P1E1q11381@greed.delorie.com><20030625014512.GA6539@lucon.org><87y8zqoi2v.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com><20030625055605.GB10136@lucon.org><87u1aeod9t.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com><20030625134728.GA17320@lucon.org><20030625112208.4d22ff8b.bkoz@redhat.com>

Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> writes:

| > Me too. But I also want a correct C++ demangler.
| 
| I would like to see support for C++ predicated on the existence of C++.
| I don't think this is unreasonable.

Same song here.

We're in 2003, guys.

-- Gaby

References:
- RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]