This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch

From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
Cc: zack at codesourcery dot com, dj at redhat dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 09:31:23 -0700
Subject: Re: RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch
References: <20030624234835.GA4852@lucon.org><200306250114.h5P1E1q11381@greed.delorie.com><20030625014512.GA6539@lucon.org> <87y8zqoi2v.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com><20030625055605.GB10136@lucon.org> <87u1aeod9t.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com><20030625134728.GA17320@lucon.org> <20030625112208.4d22ff8b.bkoz@redhat.com>

On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 11:22:08AM -0500, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> 
> > Me too. But I also want a correct C++ demangler.
> 
> I would like to see support for C++ predicated on the existence of C++.
> I don't think this is unreasonable.
> 

What did you mean by that? Were you saying my patch would use C++
when there was no working C++ compiler?



H.J.

References:
- RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]