This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: sparc-sun-solaris versus sparc64-sun-solaris

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
To: Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot com>
Cc: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>,Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>,gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org,config-patches at gnu dot org,Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 08:38:30 +0200
Subject: Re: sparc-sun-solaris versus sparc64-sun-solaris
References: <Pine.BSF.4.55.0306192309030.61043@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306191734280.32504-100000@ops2.one-point.com> <20030619145102.A25446@synopsys.com>

> In my view, the default should not be changed: as it is, we build a
> compiler that can generate either 32-bit or 64-bit code (with -m64
> switch).

Note that a compiler configured as sparc64-sun-solaris does satisfy this 
constraint too: you can use -m32 to generate 32-bit code.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

References:
- sparc-sun-solaris versus sparc64-sun-solaris
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: sparc-sun-solaris versus sparc64-sun-solaris
  - From: Jeff Sturm
- Re: sparc-sun-solaris versus sparc64-sun-solaris
  - From: Joe Buck

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]