This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: some tree-ssa vs mainline stats

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Cc: Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>, Dan Nicolaescu <dann at ics dot uci dot edu>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: 19 Jun 2003 13:33:05 -0400
Subject: Re: some tree-ssa vs mainline stats
Organization: Red Hat Canada
References: <200306182344.h5INi34X020009@gremlin.ics.uci.edu> <3EF13C3E.1070304@student.tudelft.nl> <20030619172740.GC7149@redhat.com>

On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 13:27, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 06:29:50AM +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > It creates a unique identifier for each temporary it needs to gimplify 
> > the function tree.  All you really need for a temporary is a name ...
> 
> We don't even need that, really; DECL_NAME can be NULL.  Just dumps
> want them to be pretty.
> 
Dumps already handle these by rendering unknown names as '<UVxxxx>'
(last 4 digits of the pointer value).

It's not a good solution, though.  Change 1 bit in the compiler and
suddenly all your dumps are un-diffable.


Diego.

References:
- some tree-ssa vs mainline stats
  - From: Dan Nicolaescu
- Re: some tree-ssa vs mainline stats
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: some tree-ssa vs mainline stats
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]