This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Question on TREE_CODE_CLASS of 's'
- From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
- To: rth at redhat dot com
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 03 13:31:29 EDT
- Subject: Re: Question on TREE_CODE_CLASS of 's'
> Because I thought it would be useful to use the class to distinguish
> statements. Also, if they aren't in that class, then what's it for?
Nothing anymore, AFAIK.
Is there any reason *not* to use that class and put the language-defined
statement nodes in that class? That's what I'm doing for Ada, for example,
and I'm wondering why we can't do it for every language.