This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: correctness and comprehensiveness of compilers [was: Re: C compiletime]

From: Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot com>
To: Scott Robert Ladd <coyote at coyotegulch dot com>
Cc: "Wolf, Joe" <joe dot wolf at intel dot com>, bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 09:38:22 -0700
Subject: Re: correctness and comprehensiveness of compilers [was: Re: C compiletime]
References: <7E7869DF332BFD46B05B8251005B40F6142D9F@orsmsx407.jf.intel.com> <20030618165750.A19375@synopsys.com> <3EF1CE4D.5020902@coyotegulch.com>

On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 10:53:01AM -0400, Scott Robert Ladd wrote:
> While I agree that the discussion has diverged, I also think it reflects 
> poorly on GCC when we archive inaccurate statements without reasonable 
> and polite rebuttal.

I agree; ideally we wouldn't have gotten so far off track that we started
discussing Intel's support policies in the first place.

References:
- RE: correctness and comprehensiveness of compilers [was: Re: C compiletime]
  - From: Wolf, Joe
- Re: correctness and comprehensiveness of compilers [was: Re: C compiletime]
  - From: Joe Buck
- Re: correctness and comprehensiveness of compilers [was: Re: C compiletime]
  - From: Scott Robert Ladd

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]