This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: log_accum_bugzillafied seems to work

From: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
Cc: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 10:29:30 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: log_accum_bugzillafied seems to work
References: <EFD31210-A1E8-11D7-8729-000A95A34564@dberlin.org><Pine.BSF.4.55.0306190213350.3025@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at><Pine.LNX.4.56.0306182204440.29816@dberlin.org><Pine.LNX.4.53.0306190730100.2893@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk>

On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> We could switch to getting the HTML versions of the bug reporting docs
> with lynx -source and the text versions direct from the web with lynx
> -dump (then just rewrite the link from bugs.html to the components
> description to point to the local copy).

That sounds like a good plan.

Daniel, do we have a (dynamically generated) page that conveys the same
information as gnats.html currently does and that we could use for that?

(If so, please go ahead and remove gnats.html, possible moving any
items to that other page.)

Gerald
-- 
Gerald "Jerry"   pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at   http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: log_accum_bugzillafied seems to work
  - From: Hans-Peter Nilsson

References:
- Re: log_accum_bugzillafied seems to work
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: log_accum_bugzillafied seems to work
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: log_accum_bugzillafied seems to work
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: log_accum_bugzillafied seems to work
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]