This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Proposed targets to deprecate (sigh)
- From: Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot com>
- To: Jim Wilson <wilson at tuliptree dot org>
- Cc: Nathanael Nerode <neroden at twcny dot rr dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 17:00:27 -0700
- Subject: Re: Proposed targets to deprecate (sigh)
- References: <20030616204129.GA24181@doctormoo> <3EF0E1C0.9030504@tuliptree.org>
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 03:03:44PM -0700, Jim Wilson wrote:
> Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > These CPU targets have no maintainer:
>
> In the past, we didn't have a policy of requiring a maintainer, so lack
> of a maintainer does not necessarily mean that a port is unused or
> unmaintained.
True, but if we suggest that targets with no maintainer are more likely to
be obsoleted in the future, perhaps we can scare up a volunteer or
two. :-)