This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: build regression

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Cc: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, GCC Hackers <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 10:02:55 +0100
Subject: Re: build regression
References: <87znkkzgqu.fsf@fleche.redhat.com><20030614185607.GD28612@daikokuya.co.uk><20030614203206.GA6054@daikokuya.co.uk><or65n6cibq.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><20030616190425.GH22890@daikokuya.co.uk><87znkhn759.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>

Tom Tromey writes:
 > 
 > For gcj our hope has been that we could have "gcj -C" be a drop-in
 > replacement for "javac".  This means having option compatibility.
 > I wonder if this goal is still possible to achieve.

We might have to supply a wrapper.  But that's okay, isn't it?

Andrew.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: build regression
  - From: Tom Tromey

References:
- build regression
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: build regression
  - From: Neil Booth
- Re: build regression
  - From: Neil Booth
- Re: build regression
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: build regression
  - From: Neil Booth
- Re: build regression
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]