This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: C++ compile time (again, take 2)

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu>
Cc: Loren James Rittle <rittle at latour dot rsch dot comm dot mot dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: 16 Jun 2003 10:58:56 -0400
Subject: Re: C++ compile time (again, take 2)
Organization: Red Hat Canada
References: <200306132309.h5DN91C4034960@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com> <200306160943.23282.bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>

On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 10:43, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:

>   2.95    :  46 min
>   mainline:  73 min    (89 min)
>   tree-ssa:  94 min   (118 min)
> 
Thanks Wolfgang.  I'm looking at compile time regressions this week. 
Jeff Law posted a patch to speed up constant propagation times.  I've
got another patch testing that should speed up constant propagation some
more.  I'll take a look at your code as well.


Diego.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: C++ compile time (again, take 2)
  - From: Wolfgang Bangerth
- Re: C++ compile time (again, take 2)
  - From: law

References:
- Re: C++ compile time (again)
  - From: Loren James Rittle
- Re: C++ compile time (again, take 2)
  - From: Wolfgang Bangerth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]