This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Questions on tree-inline.c
- From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- To: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
- Cc: dnovillo at redhat dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 20:25:37 -0400
- Subject: Re: Questions on tree-inline.c
- References: <10306131300.AA12695@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>
On Fri, 13 Jun 03 09:00:47 EDT, kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) wrote:
> This problem should go away when tree-ssa is merged into mainline.
>
> Well that may be, but I'm still quite curious how we have the mess we have
> now and what to do about it in the mainline. As you know, I view
> tree-ssa as an experiment, which may or may not turn out to be helpful.
> So I'd like to get this cleaned up in the meantime.
The way to clean it up is to have a language-independent functions-as-trees
representation. Which only exists on the tree-ssa branch. I suppose you
could try to merge some of the gimplifier code onto the trunk, but that
seems premature.
Jason