This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: C++ compile time (again)

From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>, Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>
Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 10:37:24 -0500
Subject: Re: C++ compile time (again)
References: <200306130918.03390.bangerth@ices.utexas.edu> <3EE9EE36.5030605@student.tudelft.nl> <1055518335.21330.82.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com>

On Friday 13 June 2003 10:32 am, Diego Novillo wrote:
> I'm considering adding POOMA to the nightly testers if we ever get it to
> compile in less than a decade.  If anyone has a lighter-weight C++
> suite, I'd be happy to throw it in the mix.

I can offer www.dealii.org. Untar, put your favorite version of gcc into PATH 
or set CXX/CC, run ./configure and "make all" and time the whole thing. As I 
said, I'd be happy to write some instructions if anyone is interested.

deal.II would have the advantage that you know whom to ask. An additional 
benefit is that this library has been proposed as a SPEC CPU2004 entry.

W.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth              email:            bangerth@ices.utexas.edu
                               www: http://www.ices.utexas.edu/~bangerth/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: C++ compile time (again)
  - From: Diego Novillo

References:
- C++ compile time (again)
  - From: Wolfgang Bangerth
- Re: C++ compile time (again)
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: C++ compile time (again)
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]