This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Questions on tree-inline.c

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: Richard Kenner <kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: 13 Jun 2003 08:47:14 -0400
Subject: Re: Questions on tree-inline.c
Organization: Red Hat Canada
References: <10306131234.AA12478@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <16105.50853.340442.252352@cuddles.redhat.com>

On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 08:42, Andrew Haley wrote:

> This was discussed at length.  The problem with putting all this in
> the java/ directory is that a great deal of logic would have been
> duplicated and we would require two files to be updated each time a
> change to the inliner was made.
> 
This problem should go away when tree-ssa is merged into mainline.  On
the tree-ssa branch we are already inlining GIMPLE, not FE, trees.


Diego.

References:
- Re: Questions on tree-inline.c
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: Questions on tree-inline.c
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]