This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 3.3.1 and GCC 3.4 Schedule
- From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
- Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, mark at codesourcery dot com
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 19:57:04 -0400
- Subject: Re: GCC 3.3.1 and GCC 3.4 Schedule
On Wednesday, Jun 11, 2003, at 19:44 US/Eastern, Daniel Berlin wrote:
On Wednesday, June 11, 2003, at 06:08 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Wednesday, Jun 11, 2003, at 17:58 US/Eastern, Wolfgang Bangerth
wrote:
I personally think that both numbers do not justify the term
"relatively few".
Fortunately, most regressions are against both 3.3 and mainline, so
a fix
would be doubly useful.
I had gone through one day and set the target milestones which was
not set and had
3.3 regression, I changed the milestone to 3.3.1. I will go through
the ones that
start with "[3.3" and set the milestone 3.3.1, that will make the
number target for
3.3.1 go higher.
I can do this in about 3 seconds with a perl script i have that does
this type of thing using sql commands.
Let me know if you haven't done it already, and i'll do it.
I have it already done because most of them I had already done there
was like 20 left,
I also pushed some back because of the comments.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski