This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: non-portable construct in gcc configure script
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> writes:
>> Yes, go ahead.
>
> Thanks, it's now in.
>
> Btw, it appears that this check is a can of worms, see Kelley's report and
> patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-04/msg02262.html
That change worries me. GAS may be happy to take .section with no
quotes, but how do we know all the assemblers out there are equally
content?
zw