This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] What would be interesting SPEC2000 tests flags?

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew Macleod <amacleod at redhat dot com>
Cc: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>, Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>, gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
Date: 02 Jun 2003 11:18:34 -0400
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] What would be interesting SPEC2000 tests flags?
Organization: Red Hat Canada
References: <200306010206.h51269Be024866@speedy.slc.redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0305312238490.10446@dberlin.org> <1054566947.3054.153.camel@p4>

On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 11:15, Andrew MacLeod wrote:

> Yes, we should have aflag to turn off any/all the into-ssa optimizations
> for other reasons too.
> 
> And we definately want to see the effect of PRE without any of them...
> It may be that having PRE turned on might automatically disable some/all
> the into-ssa optimizations...
> 
Agreed.  I have a mostly working patch for this.  I'll try to get it
done after committing a couple of bootstrapping fixes today.


Diego.

References:
- Re: [tree-ssa] What would be interesting SPEC2000 tests flags?
  - From: law
- Re: [tree-ssa] What would be interesting SPEC2000 tests flags?
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: [tree-ssa] What would be interesting SPEC2000 tests flags?
  - From: Andrew MacLeod

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]