This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Is (set (subreg:SI (reg:HI) 0) (const_int)) valid rtx?

From: Kazu Hirata <kazu at cs dot umass dot edu>
To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 07:53:13 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Is (set (subreg:SI (reg:HI) 0) (const_int)) valid rtx?

Hi,

Is the following valid rtx?

  (set (subreg:SI (reg:HI ...) 0)
       (const_int ...))

Here (reg:HI ...) is a pseudo register.  If this is valid, is the
register allocator supposed to allocate an SImode hard register for
(subreg:SI (reg:HI) 0)?  Or should this be canonicalized to the
following?

  (set (reg:HI ...)
       (const_int ...))

Thanks,

Kazu Hirata

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]