This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] GIMPLE grammar changes in function calls.

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 03:38:14 -0400
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] GIMPLE grammar changes in function calls.
References: <1053748533.6937.190.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com><1053749223.6937.192.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com>

On 24 May 2003 00:07:04 -0400, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 2003-05-23 at 23:55, Diego Novillo wrote:
>
>> Removing the STRIP_NOPS we have now at the start of is_simple_unary_expr
>> would make things work again (at the expense of forcing the gimplifier
>> to create a new temporary).
>> 
>> This is a change in the GIMPLE grammar.  Do we want to change it?  This
>> means making CALL_EXPR detection a bit more cumbersome.
>> 
> I meant that having the STRIP_NOPS at the start of is_simple_unary_expr
> is a change in the GIMPLE grammar.  Sorry.

Right.  Unless we want to allow NOPs everywhere, and I don't think we do,
the STRIP_NOPS must go.

Jason

References:
- [tree-ssa] GIMPLE grammar changes in function calls.
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [tree-ssa] GIMPLE grammar changes in function calls.
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]