This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: A few suggestions for bugzilla mail to gcc-bugs
- From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
- To: Segher Boessenkool <segher at koffie dot nl>
- Cc: gcc <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 22:02:36 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: A few suggestions for bugzilla mail to gcc-bugs
- References: <3ECEBD9C.2020303@koffie.nl>
On Sat, 24 May 2003, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A few suggestions for the mail to gcc-bugs, taking this recent
> message as an example:
>
> > PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> Can't this be automated?
Actually, it can't, AFAIK.
>
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10942
>
> Maybe show the short URL here?
Sure, i guess.
>
> > ------- Additional Comments From edmar@motorola.com 2003-05-22 17:30 -------
> > Created an attachment (id=4054)
> > --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4054&action=view)
> > Preprocessed file that caused the ICE
>
> Although I really like not getting any useless 500kB+ emails
> through gcc-bugs anymore, if an attachment is short, can it
> be sent in the actual email please?
Define short.
>
> > ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> > You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
>
> Can this line be removed?
Possibly, let me look into it.
>
> All this (except the attachment thing, maybe) applies to the messages
> to gcc-bugs only, not messages to "normal" users.
>
> Thanks for considering,
>
>
> Segher
>
>
>