This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: your RESOLVED->CLOSED changes
- From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
- To: dberlin at dberlin dot org
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 15:06:06 -0400
- Subject: Re: your RESOLVED->CLOSED changes
- References: <98AB1BCE-8D39-11D7-B31E-000A95A34564@dberlin.org>
Just my two cents and IMHO, but...
There should be one state that means "the developer thinks it's fixed"
and one just after it that means "the originator agrees." I don't
like the idea of the originator closing bug reports without
confirmation from the originator. I.e. the developer does verified
and resolved, but the originator moves resolved cases to closed.
There should be one closed state that means "closed without fixing
anything" and one that means "fixed".