Re: At the request of those drowing in gcc-bugs email

[Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>]

On Wednesday, May 21, 2003, at 05:25  PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:

> On Wed, 21 May 2003, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
> > The following will not cause gcc-bugs to receive mail:
> > "New Attachments are added"
> > "Keywords field changes"
> > "CC field changes"
> > "Any field not mentioned above changes"
> >
> >
> > If we want to make decisions that we want certain types of mail to go
> > to certain lists or something, we can.
>
> We could resurrect gcc-prs for the above (except CC field changes - I
> really don't think that's something for the lists to care about); I 
> don't
> know how the system worked that ensured that gcc-prs would accept mail
> from GNATS but not other mail.  But if so, please have it just receive
> this mail and not duplicates of what goes to gcc-bugs.
>
> I have another request about the messages that Bugzilla generates: 
> could
> they have the name of the person responsible for the new bug, comment,
> etc., in the From header (keeping the gcc-bugzilla address there as the
> email address, though From can contain multiple addresses) so it's 
> visible
> on the list who is commenting on bugs?
It's already *in* the actual text, but i'll look into it.
It might take me a day or so to get it done.