This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Varargs elimination!?
- From: Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>
- To: Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs dot mu dot OZ dot AU>
- Cc: "Bryan E. Helvey" <bhelvey at freeusp dot org>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 08:04:46 -0700
- Subject: Re: Varargs elimination!?
- References: <200305170058.46514.bhelvey@freeusp.org> <20030516061342.GA16744@ceres.cs.mu.oz.au> <200305160843.20474.bhelvey@freeusp.org> <20030516140705.GA29927@ceres.cs.mu.oz.au>
On Sat, May 17, 2003 at 12:07:05AM +1000, Fergus Henderson wrote:
> On 16-May-2003, Bryan E. Helvey <bhelvey@freeusp.org> wrote:
> > BTW, the web page, http://www.gnu.org/directory/devel/Compilers/gcc.html still
> > says:
> > "The GNU Compiler Collection is a full-featured ANSI C compiler with support
> > for K&R C..."
>
> Yes -- that probably ought to be changed.
Ouch, that whole page has lots of out-of-date information. I'll take a
crack at putting together a patch to fix it, which can be reviewed here
before being submitted to the GNU web page maintainers. There's also a
separate page for g++ that ought to be dealt with somehow.
These pages list maintainers, developers, and sponsors of the project.
Mark Mitchell is listed as the maintainer for GCC, but the g++ page
lists the GCC Steering Committee, which seems more appropriate. For
developers there can be a link to thanks.html (the g++ page does this).
For sponsors the GCC page lists "Cygnus (a RedHat company),
CodeSourcery"; should we continue to list Red Hat and CodeSourcery
there? This is related to the recent discussion about the Cygnus entry
in the FAQ.
Janis