This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

about stack/args growing up/down


I'm working on g++.dg/abi/param1.C for xstormy16, where the stack
grows up and args grow down.  In this case, expand_call (calls.c:2699)
calculates the address of the outgoing parm block as the lowest
address of the block (virtual-outgoing-args - 128), but
locate_and_pad_parm is giving the args a negative offset, causing gcc
to later put the arg in the wrong place.

For this type of stack, which of the two values (argblock,
arg->offset) is right, and which one is wrong?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]