This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Suggested Bugzilla improvements

From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
To: Volker Reichelt <reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org,bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu,giovannibajo at libero dot it
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 12:53:51 -0400
Subject: Re: Suggested Bugzilla improvements

On Tuesday, May 13, 2003, at 11:58 AM, Volker Reichelt wrote:

On 13 May, Daniel Berlin wrote:

* What's the purpose of the URL field?
  Sending an URL instead of a preprocessed file is a no-no.
  Doesn't that encourage users to send us URLs?

It was there, i never removed it, and probably won't (though i could
make it invisible if you like).

Please make it invisible (that's at least my opinion).

Done. It's now invisible.

* The page "bug_status.html" needs updating, especially the parts about the Platform/Operating System.

Thanks, i'll do it.
The page should probably be merged with "bugs/management.html" somehow
when Bugzilla goes online. One page of documentation should be enough.

Yup. I seem to have lost the message saying what other docs on the gcc website i should update when it goes live. Can someone give me the list again, if it's not too much trouble? I'm not talking about Bugzilla's docs, i mean the gcc web pages.

I seem to remember that we already took care of the internal-only docs related to branch and release creation. --Dan

Regards,
Volker

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Suggested Bugzilla improvements
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

References:
- Re: Suggested Bugzilla improvements
  - From: Volker Reichelt

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]