Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing

[Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>]

On Saturday, May 10, 2003, at 10:43  AM, Graham Stott wrote:

> Diego,
>
> Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 May 2003, Diego Novillo wrote:
> > > The branch does not really modify the configury framework (besides
> > > libmudflap and libbanshee).
> > Actually, there seems to be another bug, related to those: I use a
> > fresh objdir for every build, and never build in srcdir, but tree-ssa
> > branch always creates
> >   libbanshee/stamp-h.in
> > in my srcdir?
> I  also get that in my srcdir.

I didn't do anything odd when automaking it.
but it says:
Makefile.in:$(srcdir)/stamp-h.in: $(top_srcdir)/configure.in 
$(ACLOCAL_M4)
Makefile.in:    @echo timestamp > $(srcdir)/stamp-h.in 2> /dev/null
Makefile.in:    -rm -f config.cache config.log stamp-h stamp-h[0-9]*
aclocal.m4:dnl When config.status generates a header, we must update 
the stamp-h file.

stamp-h exists in other automake'd stuff, too:
fastjar/stamp-h.in     libffi/stamp-h.in
libbanshee/stamp-h.in  libmudflap/stamp-h.in
[Daniel-Berlins-Computer:~/gcc-rw-ssa/gcc] dberlin$

They all have it in the CVS tree, so i've cvs added 
libbanshee/stamp-h.in it and committed.

> Graham