This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: a progression 3.2.2 -> 3.2.3 -- is there a testcase?

From: Jeff Epler <jepler at unpythonic dot net>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 09:24:06 -0500
Subject: Re: a progression 3.2.2 -> 3.2.3 -- is there a testcase?
References: <20030506224744.GA30354@unpythonic.net> <20030507131959.GF27125@unpythonic.net> <200305071542.43920.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>

On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 03:44:34PM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > Following up my own message, I've determined that this is actually a
> > regression from 3.2.2 -> redhat's 3.2.2-5.  I'll now file a bug on
> > their bugzilla.
> 
> I don't think that would qualify as a regression: RedHat uses another 3.2 
> branch than the FSF 3.2 branch.

well, in any case, it's their problem now.  there's a bug in their
bugzilla and I'm going to get on with my life..

How far back did they branch?  Is there a document explaining the
relationship between redhat's gcc 3.2.2 and FSF gcc, like there was back
in the days of "gcc 2.96"?

Jeff

Follow-Ups:
- Re: a progression 3.2.2 -> 3.2.3 -- is there a testcase?
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- a progression 3.2.2 -> 3.2.3 -- is there a testcase?
  - From: Jeff Epler
- Re: a progression 3.2.2 -> 3.2.3 -- is there a testcase?
  - From: Jeff Epler
- Re: a progression 3.2.2 -> 3.2.3 -- is there a testcase?
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]