This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Experimenting with tree inliner parameter settings
On Mon, 5 May 2003, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> That does not look good, all but one are much slower :-(
>
> Would you know what the numbers look like with 3.2.3?
Please find below new results, including GCC 3.2.2. Again, running times
in seconds.
| GCC 3.2.2 | | original | --params |
---------------------+---------------+ +---------------+---------------+
STRATCOMP1-ALL | 22.72 (0.01) | | 20.07 (0.04) | 18.62 (0.04) |
STRATCOMP-770.2-Q | 0.85 (0.03) | | 0.87 (0.00) | 0.90 (0.00) |
2QBF1 | 20.60 (0.01) | | 21.49 (0.05) | 22.30 (0.03) |
PRIMEIMPL2 | 11.78 (0.01) | | 10.45 (0.01) | 10.74 (0.03) |
ANCESTOR | 9.20 (0.01) | | 10.56 (0.05) | 10.82 (0.02) |
3COL-SIMPLEX1 | 7.28 (0.02) | | 7.74 (0.02) | 8.00 (0.03) |
3COL-LADDER1 | 41.31 (0.13) | | 49.72 (0.10) | 52.39 (0.36) |
3COL-N-LADDER1 | 21.20 (0.00) | | 25.84 (0.11) | 26.12 (0.04) |
3COL-RANDOM1 | 13.22 (0.01) | | 13.70 (0.03) | 13.94 (0.04) |
HP-RANDOM1 | 15.31 (0.03) | | 17.99 (0.07) | 18.40 (0.06) |
HAMCYCLE-FREE | 1.68 (0.00) | | 1.80 (0.00) | 1.88 (0.00) |
DECOMP2 | 19.84 (0.04) | | 21.02 (0.06) | 22.49 (0.09) |
BW-P4-Esra-a | 92.28 (0.04) | | 77.36 (0.09) | 78.56 (0.20) |
BW-P5-nopush | 8.08 (0.01) | | 6.55 (0.02) | 6.64 (0.03) |
BW-P5-pushbin | 6.91 (0.00) | | 6.24 (0.04) | 6.31 (0.01) |
BW-P5-nopushbin | 2.16 (0.00) | | 2.03 (0.00) | 2.10 (0.02) |
3SAT-1 | 36.17 (0.04) | | 33.38 (0.21) | 34.25 (0.06) |
3SAT-1-CONSTRAINT | 20.20 (0.01) | | 19.94 (0.09) | 20.50 (0.05) |
HANOI-Towers | 4.91 (0.01) | | 4.61 (0.02) | 5.03 (0.02) |
RAMSEY | 8.89 (0.01) | | 9.28 (0.00) | 9.78 (0.03) |
CRISTAL | 11.94 (0.02) | | 13.34 (0.03) | 13.70 (0.08) |
HANOI-K | 38.91 (0.03) | | 40.25 (0.21) | 41.83 (0.11) |
21-QUEENS | 10.37 (0.01) | | 9.34 (0.06) | 9.44 (0.03) |
MSTDir[V=13,A=40] | 18.47 (0.00) | | 19.74 (0.00) | 20.22 (0.01) |
MSTDir[V=15,A=40] | 18.58 (0.01) | | 19.97 (0.05) | 20.49 (0.04) |
MSTUndir[V=13,A=40] | 10.23 (0.01) | | 10.81 (0.01) | 11.11 (0.01) |
TIMETABLING | 11.26 (0.01) | | 11.12 (0.05) | 12.00 (0.02) |
---------------------+---------------+ +---------------+---------------+
> We're papering over troublesome algorithms in the back end, obviously
> the correct fix would be to get rid of those, but who's working on
> that??
CodeSourcery in the not too far future (as far as I understood) and also
the tree-ssa folks?
Gerald
--
Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/