This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?

From: Segher Boessenkool <segher at koffie dot nl>
To: Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot com>
Cc: "Cook, Kelley (R.K.)" <kcook34 at ford dot com>,'David O'Brien' <obrien at freebsd dot org>, 'GCC' <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 03 May 2003 00:23:07 +0200
Subject: Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
References: <E70D26A9CDD5C04D806EB8CA831D07210FC506@na1ecm61.dearborn.ford.com> <20030501091710.A21602@synopsys.com>

Joe Buck wrote:

I think it was a mistake for gcc to make this change, in fact, one can
argue that it is a regression (in that there doesn't appear to be a
way to write a conforming C program that uses this standard means of


Standard?  What standard?  I think you mean "using this
old-fashioned, non-portable means" instead.

getting a version identifier into the object file without producing a
warning).

Segher

References:
- Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
  - From: Cook, Kelley (R.K.)
- Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
  - From: Joe Buck

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]