Re: gcc 3.3: miscompilation with -fnew-ra

[Michel LESPINASSE <walken at zoy dot org>]

On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 09:30:25PM +0200, Michael Matz wrote:
> Can you strip it down even more?  It would make things easier.

I tried but did not manage it at the time... most of the routine is
not being executed but the bug went away if I removed the remaining
unexecuted parts. (The routine used to be quite longer too... I
probably stripped about 80% of it already).

> Is there a PR about this?  I couldn't find one.  If not I'll probably
> forget about the bug, as I'm not concentrating on new-ra for 3.3 (but if
> the fix is easy there's no reason not to do it).

I dont think so. I had sent out a mail to bugs@gcc.gnu.org but I dont
suppose that opens a PR ? I'm not sure whats the proper PR submission
procedure here.

I'll double check if this still happens in the 3.3 release as I was
only using a snapshot at the time...

Cheers,

-- 
Michel "Walken" LESPINASSE
"In this time of war against Osama bin Laden and the oppressive
Taliban regime, we are thankful that OUR leader isn't the spoiled son
of a powerful politician from a wealthy oil family who is supported by
religious fundamentalists, operates through clandestine organizations,
has no respect for the democratic electoral process, bombs innocents,
and uses war to deny people their civil liberties." --The Boondocks