This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: concatenation of string literals

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk, lennox at cs dot columbia dot edu
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 20:15:18 -0400
Subject: Re: concatenation of string literals
References: <20030419040812.GA389@ftbfs.org> <200304190427.AAA25350@caip.rutgers.edu> <20030419050606.GB389@ftbfs.org> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0304190737480.2847@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk> <20030419105107.GA2978@ftbfs.org> <16036.5877.551290.49110@grandcentral.cs.columbia.edu> <200304212348.TAA10382@caip.rutgers.edu>

> But since libiberty code doesn't change very often, I don't see any
> point in zapping K&R there.

Libiberty is used by more than just gcc.  It can not change without
unanimous consent from all the projects using it.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: concatenation of string literals
  - From: Jonathan Lennox

References:
- concatenation of string literals
  - From: Matt Kraai
- Re: concatenation of string literals
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi
- Re: concatenation of string literals
  - From: Matt Kraai
- Re: concatenation of string literals
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: concatenation of string literals
  - From: Matt Kraai
- Re: concatenation of string literals
  - From: Jonathan Lennox
- Re: concatenation of string literals
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]