This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT

From: Arnaud Charlet <charlet at ACT-Europe dot FR>
To: Laurent Guerby <guerby at acm dot org>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>,Richard Kenner <kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 12:48:09 +0200
Subject: Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT
References: <10304102149.AA03328@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <20030410220624.GE4350@redhat.com> <1050057861.4038.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>

> Question to ACT: is "gnatbind -C" here for other than historical reasons
> (supporting previous gnatbind without the feature to generate Ada)?

Yes, it is also there to detect and work around cases where the Ada and the C
compiler won't handle main files identically (e.g. special handling of
the "main" function, ...).

Arno

Follow-Ups:
- Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT
  - From: Laurent Guerby

References:
- Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT
  - From: Laurent Guerby

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]