This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gcc 3.3 and libiberty?

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: c dot christian dot joensson at telia dot com
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 14:00:06 -0500
Subject: Re: gcc 3.3 and libiberty?
References: <20030326134341.A23961@fw.j-son.org> <xnbrzyaw1c.fsf@greed.delorie.com> <20030326194939.A1342@fw.j-son.org>

> ehrm, well, perhaps I'm way off here, but I thought it was a good
> thing :-) if fsf's packages using "same" subparts would actually try
> to sync each other once every now and then,

The binutils and gcc cvs *heads* are always in sync as far as
libiberty is concerned.  What you're trying to do is keep things in
sync that come from different points in the timeline.  If you expect
these being in sync to be a universal truth, you're setting yourself
up for disappointment.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcc 3.3 and libiberty?
  - From: Christian Joensson

References:
- gcc 3.3 and libiberty?
  - From: Christian Joensson
- Re: gcc 3.3 and libiberty?
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: gcc 3.3 and libiberty?
  - From: Christian Joensson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]