This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Converting to ISO C89

From: Falk Hueffner <falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de>
To: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Raja R Harinath <harinath at cs dot umn dot edu>, "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>, mark at codesourcery dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
Date: 25 Mar 2003 22:43:25 +0100
Subject: Re: Converting to ISO C89
References: <200303250642.h2P6gZ4r025932@doubledemon.codesourcery.com><m3llz3btqx.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net><1048612019.25895.7.camel@doubledemon.codesourcery.com><200303251752.MAA08671@caip.rutgers.edu><d9r88v6x3v.fsf@bose.cs.umn.edu><873clbi0p6.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com>

Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com> writes:

> Raja R Harinath <harinath at cs dot umn dot edu> writes:
> > Hopefully the ISO C89 changes also make the source C++-safe.
> 
> It will not.  There is extensive use of identifiers which are C++
> keywords, such as 'class' and 'delete'.  I do not think your
> suggestion is useful enough to warrant changing all of these
> identifiers.

Couldn't that be easily worked around with -Dclass=__class or
something?

-- 
	Falk

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Converting to ISO C89
  - From: Zack Weinberg

References:
- Converting to ISO C89
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: Converting to ISO C89
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Converting to ISO C89
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: Converting to ISO C89
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi
- Re: Converting to ISO C89
  - From: Raja R Harinath
- Re: Converting to ISO C89
  - From: Zack Weinberg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]